An Exploration of the Etiology of Hate Sartre constructs his landmark postwar analysis of anti-Semitism around four feature characters: He presents their interactions as a kind of hypothetical drama. Sartre first explains that the anti-Semite character represents the most reactionary tendencies of a French cultural nationalist. He hates modernity and sees the Jew as the representative of all that is new and mysterious within society.
It is not the question of whether Sartre was correct in his assessment of the anti-Semite but how exactly Sartre comes to arrive at a definition of anti-Semitism through the lens of examining the projected desires of the anti-Semite, as Sartre understands him.
Sartre, in addition to all of this, expounds upon the idea that the anti-Semite precisely because he does not want authentic freedom, but inauthentic freedom, that devoid of actual responsibilities, views himself as essentially above the law of the surrounding political society, which is contaminated by Jewry.
In viewing himself in this manner, he claims to be deeply committed to an idyllic primitive social order that he seeks to restore and thus all his acts of rebellion against the current order are done out of a supposed obedience to a social order, while in reality are done out of a complete desire for lawlessness Sartre30— Subsequent to this, the rebellion of some Jewish intellectuals against the state out of great frustration against the way reactionary governments starved them while being supported by Jewish bankers, were viewed as rebels acting against the current order in support of an idyllic order that the Jewish secret society to which they were loyal were secretly charting out across the world Arendt Most importantly, it is precisely because they rejected the ideals of human universality embodied in the ideals of the new Republic that the spawning ground for anti-Semitism even emerged Sartre Works Cited List Arendt, Hannah.
The Origins of Totalitarianism. Antisemitism, Racism and Xenophobia. An Exploration of the Etiology of Hate. Krauss, Rosalind and Denis Hollier.
October 87 January 1: How do we describe our enemies? And how do we explain their actions? Often times it is true that people see or wish to see particular evils in another precisely because they can recognize them so easily in themselves, but it does not follow that therefore what they see in you of those particular evils is not there just because it is in them also.
You see in them and they see in you, your mutual flaws. Most paradoxically then, by abandoning projection as a variation of scapegoating in order to describe our enemies and their actions, we can then see most clearly ourselves in our accuser and in turn, hopefully our accuser can see themselves in us.Nov 24, · Scholarly journal of scientific research and essay, wonders of science small essay recent research papers in electronics and communication captains of industry or robber barons essay essay for pride and prejudice on themes in to kill mikhail sholokhov the fate of a man essay writing hemp research paper tourism in kerala essay writer, patriotism meaning essay writing heat stroke in karachi.
Imagine the value of a book on anti-Semitism composed by a non-Jew, a deep-thinker, a philosopher, a man living in France in during a period of fierce Jew hatred; imagine what ideas this book could impart.
Sartre anti semite and jew analysis essay. What to write an essay on essay on aim of my life to become a scientist nickel and dimed essay analysis short graphophobia essay about myself dyer essay hand other harry potter ootp snape essays ngv admissions essay 7 page argumentative essay doctoral dissertation on takuan soho cookie essay.
Sartre’s anti-Semite is an overwhelmingly negative presence in society, and the philosopher’s interpretation of anti-Semitism is overwhelmingly beneficial to the reputation of Jews. Sartre argues that it is wrong to examine external causes when attempting to understand why host populations develop antagonistic attitudes to Jews.
Jean-Paul Sartre’s book is a brilliant portrait of both anti-Semite and Jew, written by a non-Jew and from a non-Jewish point of view. Nothing of the anti-Semite either in his subtle form as a snob, or in his crude form as a gangster, escapes Sartre’s sharp eye, and the whole problem of the Jew’s relationship to the Gentile is examined in a concrete and living way, rather than in terms of sociological abstractions.
Sartre possessed an incredibly weak understanding of Jewish history, culture and religion, and his analysis of the role of the Jew in the origins of anti-Semitism necessarily suffered greatly because of it.