But there are advantages to being in management, so I thought I would write a bit about management for those of you who are still in individual contributor roles. And for those of you in management roles, you can use this article to help you with career discussions you have with some of your employees. Scope From my own experience the principal advantage of management is that you get to do bigger things.
The Middle Managers of Murder Introduction Bureaucracy is not unique to Germany, however its application by the National Socialists as a tool of totalitarian oppression is peerless.
The rapid rearmament of Germany and mobilization for war required that the Nazi regime make use of the existing administrative machinery [ 1 ].
The German quest for Lebensraum living space meant more than defeating external enemies as would be the case in a traditional war.
A racially pure Germany was the other half of the Lebensraum equation and to this end the Nazis relied on the knowledge and expertise of the Weimar era bureaucrats to execute genocide. At first glance, Herz appears to be warning of the dangers of leaving the bureaucratic institutions of the German Democratic Republic GDR in place and unexamined in a reunited Germany, but Herz was writing inless than a year after the end of hostilities in the European theater in World War II.
The German bureaucracy inherited by Hitler was generally compliant with egregious Nazi policies if not eager accomplices. Herz compares the situation in the aftermath of World War II to the demise of the Weimar republic, but there is a longer history.
There is continuity from the bureaucracies of Bismarck, through the Weimar Republic, to the Nazi era, and into post-War Germany. Today, the legacy continues in the form of investigations into the possible Stasi involvement on the part of contemporary civil servants.
Origins of German Bureaucracy Ordered society would not be possible without bureaucracies to ensure the proper functioning of modern institutions such as hospitals, police, education, and the military.
Bureaucracy predates the modern era, of course, but it was not until the late 18th and early 19th centuries that bureaucracy as we currently understand it was established.
The civil service in Germany dates back to the middle ages when commoners and lesser nobles were appointed civil servants who served at the leisure of the sovereign rather than an intermediary nobleman as was typical of feudal societies.
These appointments were little different from ennoblement, and barely resembled the functionaries of a modern bureaucratic institution. There was little in the way of a uniformed discipline. For one thing, appointments were made with scant regard to the merit of the individual being appointed--nepotism and favoritism were the rule.
Even in medieval times, however, the irregular and inefficient bureaucracies focused the power of the sovereign. Through delegation of office, consolidation of knowledge--and therefore power--was the result.
The imposition of a rigid hierarchy ensured that rulers had direct insight into the happenings of everything within their domain. Michel Foucault states that "Discipline [ The modern nation state required a new mode of power that was capable of managing the increasingly complex task of disciplining society.
Furthermore, mass production and rationalization of the economy also required more complex management processes.
The old feudal society was not equipped for the industrial revolution and mass production. Remnants of feudal society persisted, but the role of the nobility diminished as professional bureaucrats assumed greater control over the administration of the military, hospitals, police, and the market economy.
The ascendancy of disciplines in governance and bureaucratic institutions can be seen as a profound shift in how power was wielded. Rather than "deploy the ostentatious signs of sovereignty" in taming the populace, power "is manifested through the brilliance of those who exercise it.
This was costly in a political and economic sense, and more importantly was insufficient to the task. One of the primary roles of the modern bureaucrat is to classify and identify individual members of society so that they may be better managed.
In a very real sense, knowledge for the bureaucrat is power--power that was once wielded exclusively by the sovereign. Max Weber argued that bureaucracies were more developed in Germany than in France, England, or America in the 19th century.
The pre-Napoleonic Prussian military had more in common with medieval feudalism than modern bureaucracy. However, one element of modern bureaucracy found in the Prussian military was professionalism and dedication to the institution in addition to or beyond any other loyalties.
The sense that the Army as an organization, and not just the sovereign or government it served, was worthy of fealty was a characteristic to which the modern bureaucracy aspired. In this sense, the rules, structure, hierarchy, duty and other abstract notions all became the mission of the solider or the bureaucrat.
This dual loyalty--to the institution as well as the nation or regime--would later be recognized by the National Socialists. As mentioned above, the Nazi party had to accept this fact if it was to expedite its struggle for power and its subsequent war effort.
The organizational technique of large armies was requisite to the formation of bureaucracy in Germany and elsewhere. Init was possible for Henry V to visit with individual members of his army, even those of the lowest rank, the night before the battle at Agincourt. Certainly, he knew every officer no matter how junior.
On the field of battle, most if not all of his men could see the king. His orders could be issued via verbal commands, and heard and relayed quickly across the short distance of the battle field the French and English lines were only yards apart. Perhaps most importantly, the English king could see the entire field of battle and act accordingly.
He had no need to rely on messengers to relay commands or on scouts to provide situation reports. The front at Waterloo was six times the length of the front at Agincourt. Both Napoleon and Wellington received only glimpses of the battle firsthand, relying almost exclusively on subordinates for very detailed, if imprecise information on the battle.
Nevertheless, both commanded capably.Exploring Argumentative Essay Topics In Business: 20 Good Suggestions Argumentative essay topics for business. Mergers are better than acquisitions because the owner can retain some of his rights and ownership in the company or organization. Employee motivation is the level of energy, commitment, and creativity that a company's workers apply to their jobs.
In the increasingly competitive business environment of recent years, finding ways to motivate employees has become a pressing concern for many managers.
Essay about Self-Motivation is Empowering Words 3 Pages Motivation is a very strong tool we can use to get further in life and to achieve our dreams and goals. Online custom essays, term papers, research papers, reports, reviews and homework assignments.
Professional custom writing service offers high quality and absolutely plagiarism free academic papers. Affordable prices and written from scratch by highly qualified academic writers. We will write a custom essay sample on Siemens: Motivation and Employees specifically for you. Recognition is one of the most powerful forms of motivation for large numbers of employees.
Although, there are numerous possible sources of recognition on the job, performance appraisals are an opportunity for employees to receive formal.
Employees’ Motivation Essay. employee motivation, because if the employees are motivated the productivity and profitability of a company or a corporate will increase and enhance.